Answer writing8 min read

Eight answer-writing mistakes that cost marks you already earned

These are not knowledge gaps. Every one of them is a student who knew the answer and did not get paid for it.

Errors covered
8
Fix time
~2 weeks
Requires
Habit, not syllabus

Overview

The gap between what a student knows and what a script shows is where most marginal results are decided. None of the errors below require more study to fix — they require a different habit, and each one can be corrected within a fortnight of deliberate practice.

The mistakes, and what to do instead

Writing the answer without showing the working

01

What it costs you

In a computational paper, working notes are where partial credit lives. A correct method with one arithmetic slip scores most of the marks if the steps are visible, and almost nothing if only a wrong final figure appears.

Do this instead

Number every working note and reference it from the face of the statement. Treat the working notes as the answer and the final figure as the summary.

Concluding without stating the provision

02

What it costs you

In law, audit and tax, the marks are distributed across provision, application and conclusion. A correct conclusion with no stated provision typically collects around half of what was available.

Do this instead

Write three separate paragraphs — provision, application, conclusion — every time, even when the answer feels obvious. The structure itself is what is being marked.

Answering the question you prepared instead of the one asked

03

What it costs you

A well-written answer to an adjacent question scores close to nothing. This is most common in theory papers, where a familiar keyword triggers a rehearsed answer.

Do this instead

Underline the operative verb in the question — compute, comment, advise, examine, distinguish — and check your answer against it before moving on.

Omitting the direction on a variance or the label on a figure

04

What it costs you

A variance without (F) or (A) is incomplete and is routinely marked down. The same applies to a figure with no indication of what it represents.

Do this instead

Label every figure as you write it rather than at the end. Close variance questions with an explicit reconciliation.

Spending fifty minutes on a fourteen-mark question

05

What it costs you

Overrunning two questions leaves a third unattempted. An unattempted question scores zero regardless of how well you would have answered it.

Do this instead

Allocate minutes per mark before you start writing, and move on at the allocated time even mid-question. Return only if time remains.

Writing law answers as bullet points

06

What it costs you

Bullet fragments lose presentation marks and make it hard for an examiner to see that you applied the provision rather than merely listed it.

Do this instead

Write law and audit answers in complete sentences. Reserve bullets for genuine lists such as documents required or conditions to be satisfied.

Citing a case or section you are not sure of

07

What it costs you

An incorrect citation damages credibility across the whole answer and can cost more than the mark it was meant to earn.

Do this instead

Name the case or describe the provision accurately without the number where you are unsure. Learn exact citations only for the high-frequency chapters.

Not answering the 'advise' part at all

08

What it costs you

Questions that ask you to advise carry a mark for the advice. Students routinely finish the computation and stop, leaving that mark on the table in every such question.

Do this instead

End every practical question with a one-line recommendation addressed to the person in the question. Make it the last thing you write, always.

Read next

FAQs

Have questions?
Find answers.

Still unsure about something? We're happy to help you figure it out.

Talk to us
How do I actually fix answer-writing habits?

Write full answers under time and have them checked against the marking structure, not just against the final figure. Reading model answers builds recognition, not habit — the change comes from producing answers and having the gaps pointed out.

Is presentation really worth marks?

Yes, and disproportionately in law, audit and accounting. Format, headings, working notes and the order of statements all carry marks independently of content, which is why two students with identical knowledge routinely score several marks apart.

How much time should I spend per mark?

A three-hour paper of one hundred marks allows roughly 1.8 minutes per mark including reading time. Budget slightly under that so you retain a buffer, and hold to the budget even when a question is going well.

Please note

These guides are study and planning aids prepared by Kartavvya, which is not affiliated with ICAI. Eligibility conditions, registration windows, fees, exam frequency and applicability cut-offs are set by ICAI and change between attempts — the New Scheme of Education and Training in particular has revised several of them. Always verify the current position on icai.org and in ICAI's announcements for your attempt before acting on anything here.

Start today

Knowing what to fix is the first step. Fixing it takes practice.

Ask any CA question at your level, generate practice on your weakest chapters, and have your written answers evaluated step by step.

Start your CA journey
  • Free to start
  • All 3 CA levels
  • Answer evaluation

Keep studying on Kartavvya